|
|
|
Á¶¿ë¾Ö ( Cho Yong-Ae ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ Àû½ÊÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ
Àº¿µ ( Eun Young ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ±¸¹Ì¿Á ( Gu Mee-Ock ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ±è°æ¼÷ ( Kim Kyung-Sook ) - »ï¼º¼¿ïº´¿ø °û¹Ì°æ ( Kwak Mi-Kyong ) - »ï¼º¼¿ïº´¿ø ±èÁ¤Çý ( Kim Jeong-Hye ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»ó°£È£Àü¹®ÇÐ À̼±Èñ ( Lee Seon-Heui ) - °¡Ãµ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ¹Úµ¿¾Æ ( Park Dong-Ah ) - Çѱ¹º¸°ÇÀǷῬ±¸¿ø ³ëÈ°æ ( Noh Hwa-Kyung ) - ¼¿ï´ëÇб³ ³»°ú°èÁßȯÀÚ½Ç
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This study aimed to adapt the previously developed, high-quality oral care guideline for the usage in clinical settings in Korea.
Methods: Guideline adaptation process was undertaken according to the guideline adaptation manual version 2.0 developed by National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (Kim, et al., 2011) and the standardized methodology for nursing practice guideline adaptation (Gu, et al. 2012).
Results: The adapted oral care guideline was consisted of 10 domains and 85 recommendations. The number of recommendations in each domain were: 4 general issues, 2 oral care indications, 10 oral assessment 16 general oral care, 15 oral care for critically ill, 15 oral care for cancer patients, 14 oral care for cancer patients withoral complications , 5 oral careeducation , 2 oral care referral, and 2 documentation and report. Ten point six percent of the recommendations were rated as grade A, 20.0% as grade B grade, and more than half (69.4%) were rated as grade C.
Conclusion: The adapted oral care practice guideline is expected to included the evidence-based practice guidelines as fundamentalss of nursing practice. Dissemination of the developed guideline nationwide would contribute improving the efficiency of oral care practice.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
±¸°°£È£, ½Ç¹«Áöħ, ¼ö¿ë°³ÀÛ
Oral Care, Practice Guideline, Evidence-Based Nursing, Adaptation
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|